Cannabis considerations explored and discussed

I’m against the legalization of marihuana in Canada.

By Jonah Kondro

If my readers haven’t figured it out from the few and small passive remarks I left in some of my recent columns, I’m against the legalization of marihuana in Canada.

I’ve read a few magazine articles, a few social media posts, and a few newspaper columns that address the questions of the legal sale of marihuana. I’ve also chit chatted with many college kids and listened to numerous opinions. I find that there are two primary arguments that are pro-pot. One, the taxes generated from sales could be used to support government initiatives; and two, the legalization would remove stress from the police and court systems.

If marihuana becomes legal, in theory, the criminal activity that surround the illegal sale of pot would drop. Thus, less offenders would be put through the court system and potentially the prison system in Canada. The provincial and federal court costs, that are associated with the legal apparatus, would drop. And it would follow that if less criminals are charged and found guilty, less criminals would be placed into incarceration facilities; operational costs of those facilities would therefore also drop.

I’m going to object to the notion that the legalization of pot would lower the costs of the court and incarceration systems. The police and court apparatuses are already in place; if pot were to become legal, attentions would simply shift from one evil to another. If it isn’t the criminal activity of pot, it would be the criminal activity associated with the illegal sale of cocaine or fentanyl that would be the targets of the police and court systems. The stakes are quite higher when addressing the harder drugs: police investigations into those matters would increase in sophistication; the court proceedings would be lengthier; and the incarceration terms will increase for more severe offenses. The cost of focusing on the harder drugs would be more expensive to address.

The primary argument for pro-pot is the influx of new tax dollars the government would receive from the legal sale of the substance. It seems to me the opinions that posit the potential tax benefits also quietly suggest there is already a large portion of the population that use marihuana illegally; and that this portion of users would begin to purchase pot legally if it were made so.

I question what is actually being taxed. Certainly legal pot sales would add some new shiny loonies to the government’s change purse; however, there is human psychologically that is also being taxed. Sometimes a person is smoking a spliff to enjoy bad television, but other times a person is smoking a spliff to forgot about first world sorrows: overdue bills, job loss, or the price of oil. To suggest that the legal sale of pot would add tax dollars to the government’s bank account is to also suggest that Canadian citizen psychology is up for taxation. I feel that the legalization of marihuana would tax anxiety, tax depression, and tax unhappiness. Real human psychological needs would not be addressed.

There are greater concerns to consider that supersede debates about the legalization of marihuana.

Just Posted

Fatality near Rimbey

Collision still under investigation

UPDATE: Motorist dies near Ponoka after loose tire collides with vehicle

Ponoka RCMP seek assistance in locating vehicle belonging to the tire

Six horses stolen from Winfield area

RCMP seek public’s help in missing horses investigation

Almost 100 kgs of suspected cocaine seized at Coutts border crossing

84 bricks of suspected cocaine seized from California residents’ vehicle; largest recorded seizure.

Good response to kids and drugs program

Substance abuse prevention program held

Google searches suggest 2017 a tough year

What were Canadians were curious about: Google searches suggest 2017 a tough year

Democrat wins stunning red-state Alabama Senate upset

Democrat Doug Jones wins stunning red-state Alabama Senate upset against Roy Moore

New fighter-jet competition to have national ‘economic interest’ requirement

Trudeau government wants to replace Canada’s aging CF-18s with 88 new fighters by as early as 2025

The top-binged shows on Netflix in 2017

Which show did you cheat on your spouse with by watching ahead?

2017 word of the year: Feminism

Merriam-Webster’s word of the year for 2017: ‘Feminism’

200 Russians to compete in Olympics as neutrals

The Russian Olympic Committee expects 200 to compete in South Korea

Researchers claim the ‘man flu’ does exist

Review of scientific studies suggests ‘man flu’ may be more intense: researcher

Trudeau appoints Supreme Court chief justice

Prime Minister Trudeau appoints Richard Wagner as Supreme Court chief justice

Most Read