Skip to content

Is United States headed to war in Korea?

The US-South Korean military exercises will continue until the end of this month

The US-South Korean military exercises will continue until the end of this month and the North Korean threats to do something terrible if they do not stop grow more hysterical by the day.

The Great Successor, Kim Jong-un, was shown signing a decree that ordered North Korea’s long-range missile forces to be ready to launch against the United States, while senior military officers looked on approvingly.

On the wall behind Kim was a map, helpfully labelled “US Mainland Strike Plan,” that showed the missile trajectories from North Korea to Hawaii, Los Angeles, Washington, DC, and Austin, Texas. (Why Austin? Doesn’t he like indie rock?) It was a scene straight out of the villain’s lair in an early James Bond movie, except they’d forgotten to set it in a cave.

These threats are so palpably empty that the instinct of both the Pentagon and the US State Department is just to ignore them. North Korea has no operational missile that can reach even western Alaska, no miniaturized nuclear warhead to put on such a missile, and no long-range targeting capability. But the politics of the situation demands the US government respond seriously to every threat, however foolish.

So recently the U.S. government sent two B-2 bombers all the way from Missouri non-stop to drop bombs on some uninhabited islands near North Korea, just to remind Pyongyang that it can.

It’s all still just a charade so far, and the United States would not even play this game if the logic of both international and domestic politics did not oblige it to respond. But it is playing nevertheless and the risk of miscalculation is quite serious.

The North Korean military doubtless understands that they must not get into a nuclear war with the United States, but they may believe that its dozen or so nuclear weapons make it safe for them to use conventional force without facing American nuclear retaliation. And they do have rather a lot of conventional military force at their disposal.

Kim Jong-un’s threats are being exposed as bluffs almost daily, and he may ultimately feel obliged to DO something to restore his credibility. It would probably be just a limited local attack somewhere but in the current psychological atmosphere that could escalate rapidly to full-scale conventional war.

It would be a major war, for although North Korea’s weapons are mostly last-generation, that is not such a big handicap in ground warfare as it is in the air or at sea. North Korean troops are well-trained and there are more than a million of them.

The North Koreans would attack south in a three-pronged thrust, accompanied by Special Forces operations deep in South Korean territory — just as they did in 1950. The geography gives them few alternatives. US-South Korean strategy would also echo 1950-51: contain the North Korean attack as close to the border as possible, and then counter-attack up the west coast on an axis heading north through Kaesong to Pyongyang.

Even if the North Korean air force were effectively destroyed in the first couple of days, as it probably would be, this would be a highly mobile, hard-fought land war in densely populated territory involving high casualties and massive destruction. The world has not seen such a war for more than 50 years now.

We really don’t need to see it again.

Gwynne Dyer is an independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries.