Reader asks questions about proposed lodge

In the Dec. 22 edition of the Rimbey Review there was a letter published with the headline ‘Reader wants explanation of quote.’

Dear Editor,

In the Dec. 22 edition of the Rimbey Review there was a letter published with the headline ‘Reader wants explanation of quote.’

This was a request made following a statement in the Nov. 3 Review by a Rimoka board member when he said the board and management were going in two different directions.

I have not seen an explanation for the quote. Being a taxpayer in the town of Rimbey I have a few questions myself for our town council and the Rimoka Board.

Being involved in the land development in the Town of Rimbey for approximately 22 years I have a fair idea of what is required by a developer before he can put up a ‘for sale’ sign.

Now I ask my question: have rules been changed? If so, when were they changed and by whom?

It appears the proper criteria was bypassed when SJC sold property to the County of Ponoka who, in turn, passed it over to the Town of Rimbey and Rimoka Housing Foundation for the proposed seniors’ lodge.

Now to get back to the property. Strange as it may seem, part of the 8.9 acres was a retention pond built by SJC Developments to take off parking lot runoff from Best Western Motel.

This also served as municipal reserve which all developers forfeit.

Now, my next question is that if the developer and town council had everything in proper order, then the town already owned the retention pond, so why did the county pay $40,000 per acre for property the town already owned?

I understand the present pond is going to be filled in and a new one made further to the east of the present one on a lower part of the property.

Why is the street known as Rimstone Drive approximately two to three feet higher than the adjoining property?

According to drawings, the lodge will be started next to the adjoining property west of the present walkway.

From Rimstone Drive to the adjoining property to the south and west of the present walkway is approximately two and a half to three acres.

Part of this land will be turned into parking and part will be a paved area to the front of the lodge. If this is the lower part of the properties, how will the runoff get to the new detention pond to the east?

As I see it, the only way is to build up this portion to meet the level of Rimstone Drive.

Does this make any logical sense?

Furthermore was any thought ever given to what sort of complications the present plan has created for any future development?

There are many more questions that need to be asked.

Reuben E. Giebelhaus

 

Just Posted

Citizens on patrol group form executive

Citizens on Patrol in Rimbey moves closer to reality

Rimbey high school students form WE group

High school students take on positive roles

Live music tonight at Beatty House

Spruce and the Meadowlark to entertain

Semi collides with vehicle on Highway 2

Members of the Ponoka Integrated Traffic Unit dealt with a call on Highway 2 north of Ponoka

Nebraska approves TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline

Nebraska’s Public Service Commission approved TransCanada’s Keystone XL route in a close vote

Forecast calls for a snowy Canadian winter

Canadians told to brace for a ‘classic’ Canadian winter with lots of snow

Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Philip celebrate 70th anniversary

The Queen and The Duke of Edinburgh are celebrating their platinum wedding anniversary

Charles Manson, leader of murderous ’60s cult, dead at 83

Charles Manson, whose cult slayings horrified world, dies

VIDEO: The Last Jedi is going to be the longest ‘Star Wars’ movie yet

Newest movie in the franchise will beat Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones

Dead boy’s father posts Facebook response after Appeal Court upholds conviction

David, Collet Stephan were found guilty in their son Ezekiel’s 2012 death from bacterial meningitis

Bank of Canada cautious of future rate hikes

The Bank of Canada remains cautious on future rate hikes due to low- inflation risk

London theatre received allegations against Kevin Spacey

The theatre said Thursday the 20 allegations deal with incidents between 1995 and 2013.

Most Read